Thylane Blondeau -10 yrs old models for french vogue

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau

thylane blondeau



Fashion has a new muse, and she is 10 years old. Meet Thylane Loubry Blondeau.

The child model's parents are Patrick Blondeau, a former soccer player, and VĂ©ronika Loubry, who used to present a celebrity news show on French television and now designs a mother-daughter clothing line. Thylane has graced the cover of VogueEnfants, starred in ad campaigns for the children's lines of major brands, and regularly works with top fashion photographers including Dani Brubaker. She started early: in October, 2005, at the age of 4, Thylane walked in Jean-Paul Gaultier's spring show. She came to my attention earlier this year, when she was one of the models featured in a Vogue Paris — that's regular, grown-up Vogue, not kiddie Vogue — editorial that took fashion's fetishistic, often exploitative relationship with extreme youth as its subject. Now there's a "Fuck Yeah" Tumblr devoted to her every move. 


I personally found the Vogue Paris editorial refreshing. Sure, it was disturbing, but it seemed purposefully, knowingly disturbing — disturbing in the sense that it aimed to perturb and provoke a reader to question the fashion industry's treatment of young girls as a kind of natural resource to be transformed into product, which is, you know, itself disturbing. It was published in the knowledge that outrage would follow, and, like clockwork, outrage came.
Models only three or four years (and one middle-school growth spurt) older than Thylane grace international runways, glossy magazine covers, and ad campaigns for luxury brands regularly. Only they are not styled as children, which Thylane and the other child models so obviously were in this spread, with their too-big shoes and their white, little-kid cotton undershirts peeking out from too-big designer outfits, made up to look like they'd gone a little nuts with mum's rouge. No, children just a few years older than Thylane are styled and made up to look like the adults they can pass for — thanks to age-exceptional height — all for the purposes of selling clothes and accessories. No outrage — a total, complete lack of anything that might be called "outrage" — ever greets the publication oftheir work. That's why, to me, so much of the criticism of that particular Vogue Paris spread rang hollow.

But while I didn't find that single spread necessarily inappropriate, the body of Thylane's work — and fashion's apparent fascination with her — gives me pause. Is it really necessary to depict a 10-year-old hooking her thumb into her jeans and slinging her hip out? Is it really a good idea to intentionally recall, as one writer put it, a Diesel ad? If looking at some of her many, many fashion photographs makes me feel creepy, is it because of the way the magazines and photographers have chosen to present her, or is it because of something I'm reading into the images?


Even posing questions like these about the sexualization of children is discomfiting. To ask is this child too sexy is to put a child's body under a kind of scrutiny that is (and should be) strange and unnatural, and that's not a thing that should be taken lightly. But it's one thing for a parent to take a photo of his or her little girl while she's running around a beach in a pair of swimsuit bottoms. It's another for a fashion magazine to take a photo of a 10-year-old sitting topless on a bed and publish it for a global audience. What steps are being taken to ensure Thylane is comfortable with these images? Is she aware that, to people older and more familiar with the commonplaces of fashion photography than she is, the way she is being portrayed reads as somewhat adult, somewhat sexualized? Is a 10-year-old truly capable of consenting to being shot in the nude — by a fashion industry client that is using her body to move product, no less? Is a 10-year-old capable of understanding the ramifications of that consent?
It's complicated. Cultural conservatives and politicians tried to censor Robert Mapplethorpe's images of nude children, but it always seemed to me that you'd have to be kind of sick to see a picture of a naked little boy spontaneously climbing on an armchair as something sexual. (And the children themselves, once they were grown up, strenuously defended the artist.) This isn't Mapplethorpe, though, and fashion editorials aren't art; they're the pictures that go between the luxury ads. I see no reason to trust that the fashion industry's intentions are honorable.
Especially when fashion's overall relationship with age is, to put it bluntly, fucked up. Models commonly start working internationally at age 13-14, and the pace of the work makes it difficult to do things like finish high school. (Models are independent contractors, and are thus exempt from many provisions of labor law, including minimum wage and age requirements, as well as legal protection from sexual harassment.) Fashion loves to infantilize grown women and portray girls as though they were adults. A fashion shoot isn't necessarily, categorically an inappropriate place for a 10-year-old to be — with appropriate supervision. I don't want to argue that, because of her age, Thylane should be limited to posing with bouncy balls or over sized lollipops for French children's catalogs, or whatnot.
It's just that so many of the tropes of fashion photography — the focus on the long limbs, the aestheticism and objectification of these young bodies, the preference for blank expressions and softly opened mouths — are inherently sexuality. And that's creepy. (It doesn't help things that the writer of the "Fuck Yeah" blog and his or her commenters are all too keen to dismiss any criticism of the nature of these pictures as the product of America's "uptight culture." And to remind us all, "If you're seeing the images in a sexual way, then that is obviously your OWN problem.")
I modeled as a child, beginning around the age of 7 or 8, and I enjoyed it very much. I earned money, which I saved, I got an occasional day off school, I got to be around adults with interesting, creative jobs who made the work we were doing seem fun, I saw some interesting places. Unless you consider the mere fact of a child having "work" inappropriate, I would say that all of my work was very appropriate to my age and my interests. I don't want to condemn another child, and another family, for making the decision to pursue modeling. But something about some of these pictures, on a level almost deeper than language, creeps me out. And for that, I blame fashion, not the child or her parents.
Read more ...

Maria Hose Cristerna - Mexican "vampire mother"

Maria Jose Cristerna A real Life Vampire who is also known as Mujer Vampiro or Vampire Woman ,Maria  Jose a 35 years old Mexican Mom of four turned to body modification after years of domestic abuse from her husband. She was trained lawyer and she is from deep religious family background who married at the age of 17.


Maria Jose Cristerna has tattooed almost 100% of her body including her private parts and she also has titanium 'horns' implanted into her skull and dental implants that give her 'fangs'.


Maria Jose Cristerna said " The horns I have are symbol of strength and were implanted without anaesthetic .I had fangs done because I loved vampires as a little girl and I changed the color of my eyes so they were how I really wanted them to be. " she further adds" Tattooing is my way of being immortal, of really being a vampire and not dying - leaving my work on other people's skin"


Despite being a Real Life Freak she claims to be living a 'normal life' at her home in Mexico




Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 


Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 

Maria Hose Cristerna 
Read more ...

Fedor The Russian Giant

During The Twenty Century in Russia There Once Lived a 9 feet 3inch giant call Fedor.He was So Huge That World Leaders from all around the world Invited him just to see him. He even visited Theodor Roosevelt and even the Pope Of Rome but due to lack of evidence about him except this few photography He has not been officially listed as world's tallest person in history and the only evidence that he was the tallest person to walk in this earth is this photography that was actually taken during the 20th century. However He is still unofficially world's tallest man in the history and Robert Pershing Wadlow who was 8 feet 11.1 inch tall is officially the world's tallest person ever.

You can read more about Robert Pershing Wadlow in my previous post  here.


















Read more ...

Labels